History of dyslexia
Word blindness
The story of dyslexia begins in the late 19th century. In 1877, German physician Adolf Kussmaul described “word blindness” (Wortblindheit) in a patient who had lost the ability to read despite intact vision and intelligence. This was an acquired condition, resulting from brain injury, but it established the principle that reading could be specifically affected while other cognitive abilities remained intact.
The breakthrough for what we now call dyslexia came in 1896, when British ophthalmologist W. Pringle Morgan published a case report in the British Medical Journal. He described a 14-year-old boy named Percy who was “the smartest lad in the school” yet could not learn to read. Morgan called this “congenital word blindness”, distinguishing it from the acquired form: Percy had never been able to read, despite being bright and well-taught.
This was the first documented case of developmental dyslexia in English medical literature. Morgan’s careful observation that the difficulty was specific to reading, not a reflection of general intelligence, was remarkably prescient.
The visual theory and its consequences
For much of the early 20th century, dyslexia was understood primarily as a visual problem. American neurologist Samuel Orton proposed in the 1920s that dyslexia was caused by “strephosymbolia” (twisted symbols), resulting from incomplete cerebral dominance. He believed that dyslexic people saw letters and words reversed or mirrored.
Orton’s theory was influential but largely incorrect. It led to interventions focused on visual training and, harmfully, forced right-handedness in left-handed children, on the theory that mixed laterality caused reading problems. These interventions were ineffective and sometimes damaging.
The persistent myth that dyslexia is about “seeing letters backwards” traces directly to Orton’s work. While some dyslexic people do occasionally reverse letters, this is not the core feature and is common in all young readers.
The backwards myth
The idea that dyslexia means seeing letters backwards is one of the most persistent misconceptions in education. Letter reversals are common in all children learning to read and are not a reliable indicator of dyslexia. The actual core difficulty is in phonological processing: how the brain handles the sounds of language.
The phonological revolution
The 1970s and 1980s brought a fundamental shift in understanding. Researchers including Isabelle Liberman and later Sally Shaywitz demonstrated that dyslexia is primarily a difficulty with phonological processing: the ability to recognise, manipulate, and map the sounds of language onto written symbols.
This was a paradigm shift. Dyslexia was not about vision. It was about how the brain processes the building blocks of language. Phonological awareness, the ability to hear and work with the individual sounds in words, was consistently found to be weaker in dyslexic readers, regardless of intelligence, motivation, or teaching quality.
Neuroimaging studies from the 1990s onwards confirmed this understanding, revealing that dyslexic brains show different patterns of activation during reading tasks, particularly in left hemisphere language regions. Dyslexia became understood as a neurological difference in how the brain organises language processing, not a deficit of intelligence or effort.
From deficit to difference
The language around dyslexia has shifted significantly over the past few decades. “Word blindness” gave way to “reading disability”, which gave way to “specific learning difficulty”, which is now increasingly framed within the neurodiversity paradigm as a neurological difference.
This reframing matters. For over a century, many people with dyslexia were labelled as lazy, stupid, or unmotivated. They were punished for what they could not do. The attribution of reading difficulty to a character flaw rather than a neurological difference caused lasting harm to self-esteem, educational outcomes, and life chances.
Modern understanding acknowledges that dyslexia involves genuine difficulties with reading and written language, while also recognising the strengths that often accompany it: strong visual-spatial reasoning, creative thinking, and the ability to see patterns and connections that others miss.
The neuroscience is clear
Functional MRI studies consistently show that dyslexic brains process written language differently, with reduced activation in left hemisphere language areas and increased activation in right hemisphere regions. These differences are present from early childhood and are not caused by poor teaching or lack of effort.1
Dyslexia in the UK
The UK has a relatively strong framework for recognising dyslexia in education, with the British Dyslexia Association playing an influential role in advocacy and support since 1972. Dyslexia is recognised within the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) framework, and schools have a legal obligation to make reasonable adjustments.
However, access to assessment varies significantly by region and by socioeconomic background. Families who can afford private assessment often secure support more quickly than those relying on school or NHS provision. This inequality means that dyslexia, like many neurodevelopmental conditions, is more readily identified in those with greater resources.
Further reading on neurobetter
neurobetter services
- Local services directory - find dyslexia assessment and support services near you
- Ask a Counsellor - get a confidential response from a registered counsellor
If you are in crisis
If you are struggling right now, please visit our Get Help Now page for immediate support options, including Samaritans (116 123), Crisis Text Line (text SHOUT to 85258), and NHS 111.
-
Shaywitz, S.E. and Shaywitz, B.A. (2008). Paying attention to reading: the neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Development and Psychopathology, 20(4), pp. 1329-1349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000631 ↩
This page has had one contribution from our team and community, and was last updated on 16 February 2026. Keeping this content up-to-date is a difficult task, especially as details can change quickly. We welcome feedback on any of the content in the Advice Hub, including any lived experience you can share. Please login or create an account to submit feedback.
neurobetter's content and services are intended to provide information, peer support, and connections to services. They are not intended to replace, override, or contradict medical or psychological advice provided by a doctor, psychologist or other healthcare professional.